|
|
|
Teaching
Ideas and Units - Beaut Ideas
Targeting
Text
A
Guided Writing Project
Targeting
Text was a collaborative project undertaken by teachers from a cluster
of three schools in the Bowen District Lindisfarne Primary, Lindisfarne
North Primary and Cambridge Primary. The purpose of the project was to
focus on the place of guided writing in a balanced writing program. Inspired
and supported by Dr Jan Turbill of the University
of Wollongong, the teachers were able to develop and share their own skills
in using guided writing as a key teaching strategy.
Overview
of the Project
First,
a planning group was established to co-ordinate and implement shared professional
learning opportunities utilising the skills and expertise of teachers
from the three schools. Dr Jan Turbill from the University of Wollongong
was invited as a guest speaker to share her expertise and knowledge in
this area.
- A professional
learning day was attended by all teachers from the three cluster
schools during the first day of term 1 2000. As explained below, Jan
Turbill spoke about the four ages of writing,
the connections between reading and writing,
beliefs about the learning and teaching of writing in the
Age of Writing as Social Purpose and the components of a
balanced writing program.
- Teachers
from each of the schools were given opportunities to observe Jan Turbill
demonstrating strategies for teaching guided writing, using narrative
texts. Jan visited each school for half a day. She worked with small
groups of children from Prep to 6 for 20 -30 minutes, while groups of
teachers observed.
At
the end of the teaching demonstration teachers were given the opportunity
to discuss strategies observed in the guided writing session. The foci
for the guided writing sessions were:
- During
April an evening professional learning workshop was attended
by all teachers from the three cluster schools. Jan Turbill facilitated
grade group sharing of ideas for structuring writing
programs and strategies for teaching writing.
She guided grade groups in developing ideas for teaching different text
types using a range of stimulus materials. Strategies developed for
teaching students to write narratives, reports, recounts, expositions,
and procedures are outlined below.
What
is guided writing?
Guided
writing involves the teacher working with small groups of students. In
guided writing students apply the understandings they have gained from
modelled and shared writing sessions, with varying degrees of support
from the teacher. The students explore aspects of the writing process,
which have been demonstrated. The teacher predetermines the teaching focus
from observations and analysis of students' writing. The session is focussed
on specific aspects of writing that students need to develop.
Susan
Hill (1999) explains guided writing in her book Guiding Literacy Learners,
Eleanor Curtain, Victoria:
'Guided
writing involves individuals or small groups of students writing a range
of text types. The teacher may provide short mini-lessons to demonstrate
a particular aspect of text type, grammar, punctuation or spelling. Guided
writing is linked to reading and various text types are used as models.
Students may use writing frames or templates as scaffold for writing.'
David
Hornsby (2000) outlines two different ways that guided writing can be
managed. Each approach has a different main purpose.
- One or
two sessions may be planned for small groups of children who need assistance
with specific writing skills
- Many sessions,
building upon shared reading and writing of a particular genre, are
planned. Firstly, the children are immersed in the genre during reading.
Secondly, they compose a text in that genre during shared/interactive
writing. Finally, they are guided to write their own text in that genre.
Hornsby,
D. (2000) A Closer Look at Guided Reading Eleanor Curtain, Victoria.
Guided
writing is useful for a range of teaching purposes, which will vary, depending
on the developmental stage and the needs of the students.
Four
ages of writing
Jan
Turbill explained that the way in which student writing has been viewed
has changed from the 1960s to the present. As teachers conceptions
of writing have changed, so have their teaching practices.
| 1960s
|
Age
of writing as production or encoding |
| 1970s
|
Age
of writing as creativity |
| 1980s
|
Age
of writing as a process |
| 1990s
|
Age
of writing as social purpose |
© Dr Jan
Turbill University of Wollongong The
Age of Writing as Social Purpose
This
time is characterised by a set of beliefs about writing, outlined below.
Teachers are invited to think about the implications of each belief for
the ways in which writing is taught.
Age
of Writing as Social Purpose
| BELIEFS
ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF WRITING |
WHAT
DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE TEACHING OF WRITING? |
| writing
is both a process and a product |
|
| we
learn to write by writing |
|
| spelling
and handwriting are tools for writing |
|
| writing
is a powerful learning tool |
|
| the
conditions which existed for learning oral language can be applied
in classroom settings for learning written language; namely, immersion,
demonstrations, expectation, responsibility, approximation, use,
response. |
|
| readers
learn about writing from reading and writers learn about reading
from writing |
|
| evaluation
of written language is a constant part of the teaching cycle
|
|
| learners
need constant demonstrations (models) of both process and product
of that which they are to learn |
|
| when
writers perceive themselves are writers they read like writers;
they engage in how texts work |
|
| different
subject areas purposes and audiences require different 'forms' or
'registers' of language |
|
| language
is functional, social and contextual; it is the principal vehicle
for making sense of our world |
|
| spelling
is thus functional, social and contextual activity |
|
| spelling
serves writers but is learned primarily through reading |
|
| spellers
need to be effective readers and proofreaders |
|
| language
learning is a problem solving process; namely gathering information;
formulating and testing hypotheses; gaining feedback and confirming
the hypotheses |
|
| learners
use a variety of coping strategies to solve the written language
puzzle |
|
| teachers
need to know why they do what they do with respect to the written
language classroom practice |
|
| children
need to learn to write different kinds of texts for different purposes;
they need to know a variety of genres in order to be successful
in their future lives |
|
| writing
in schools should be more than 'story writing'; it should focus
on particular genres |
|
| children
learn language, learn through language, and learn about language
as they use language |
|
| teachers
and students need a language to talk about language |
|
| teachers
need to make explicit how different genres work; how they are constructed;
what the functions of different genres are |
|
| teachers
and students need to share understandings and language about successful
written genres |
|
| teachers
need to make explicit their own beliefs about learning, about what
writing is & why they teach it as they do |
|
| teachers
need to be able to justify their evaluation judgements about writing |
|
| profiles
have the potential of supporting teachers and learners when teachers
have developed a thorough understanding of language and literacy
|
|
| profiles
should be viewed as a framework for student learning and a guide
for student assessment in writing development |
|
©
Dr Jan Turbill University of Wollongong
Reading/Writing
Connections
When
discussing the development of an effective writing program, Jan emphasised
the importance of recognising the strong connections between reading and
writing. The following summary is taken from Towards a Reading Writing
Classroom, written in collaboration with Andrea Butler (1984, Rozelle:
Primary English Teaching Association).
Reading
and writing are both acts of composing. Readers, using their background
of knowledge and experience, compose meaning from the text; writers, using
their background of knowledge and experience, compose meaning into text.
BEFORE
READING
| What
Readers Do BEFORE Reading |
What
Writers Do BEFORE Writing |
| The
proficient reader brings and uses knowledge: |
The
proficient writer brings and uses knowledge: |
| about
the topic (semantic knowledge) |
about
the topic (semantic knowledge) |
| about
the language used (syntactic knowledge) |
about
the language to be used (syntactic knowledge) |
| about
the sound-symbol system (graphophonic knowledge) |
about
the sound-symbol system (graphophonic knowledge) |
| |
|
| The
proficient reader brings certain expectations to the reading cued
by: |
The
proficient writer brings certain expectations based on:
|
| previous
reading experiences |
previous
writing experiences |
| presentation
of the text |
previous
reading experiences |
| the
purpose for the reading |
the
purpose of the writing |
| the
audience for the reading |
the
audience for the writing |
DURING
READING
| What
Readers do DURING Reading |
What
Writers do DURING Writing |
| The
proficient reader is engaged in: |
The
proficient writer is engaged in: |
| DRAFT
READING |
DRAFT
WRITING |
| skimming
and scanning |
writing
note and ideas |
| searching
for sense |
searching
for a way in, a lead |
| predicting
outcomes |
selecting
outcomes |
| re-defining
and composing meaning |
re-reading
|
| |
revising
and composing meaning |
| RE-READING
|
RE-WRITING
|
| re-reading
parts as purpose is defined, clarified or changed |
re-writing
text as purpose changes or becomes defined, clearer |
| taking
into account, where appropriate, an audience |
considering
readers and the intended message |
| discussing
text, making notes |
discussing
and revising text |
| reading
aloud to hear message |
re-reading
to hear the message |
| USING
WRITERS CUES |
PREPARING
FOR READERS |
| using
punctuation to assist meaning |
reading
to place correct punctuation |
| using
spelling conventions to assist meaning |
proofreading
for conventional spelling |
| |
deciding
on appropriate presentation |
AFTER
READING
| What
Readers Do AFTER Reading |
What
Writers Do AFTER Writing |
| |
|
| The
proficient reader: |
The
proficient writer: |
| responds
in many ways, eg. talking, doing, writing |
gets
response from readers |
| reflects
upon it |
gives
to readers |
| feels
success |
feels
success |
| wants
to read again |
wants
to write again |
Text
is a two-sided mirror rather than a window, with writers and readers unable
to see through to each other but gazing upon reflections of their own
minds.
(Frank
Smith 1982)
A
Balanced Writing Program
A
balanced writing program has the following components, which are interdependent
and supported by each other:
Modelled
Writing
The
teacher writes the text on a chart or white board. As the teacher composes
the text he/she 'thinks aloud' (explicit teaching) to help the students
understand the element of writing being demonstrated.
Shared/
Interactive writing
In
shared writing the teacher leads the class or group to compose a text.
The teacher scribes for the students so they can focus on composing the
text. The teacher may lead the class to explore various text types, construct
more complex sentences, edit and proofread. The class is encouraged to
contribute to the construction of the text.
Interactive
writing is a form of writing where the teacher sometimes hands over the
pen to allow a student to write the next word.
Guided
writing
Independent
Writing
Independent
writing must be a daily component of the writing program. Students need
opportunities to write for a variety of purposes and a range of audiences.
Independent writing builds fluency and familiarity with a variety of text
forms.
Language
Experience
The
class shares experiences, such as excursions, drama, discussion, art/craft,
or music, then the class generates an oral text which can be written down
as a shared or independent writing activity.
Below
is an overview of the roles played by teacher and students in a well-constructed
writing program.
A
BALANCED WRITING PROGRAM:
TEACHING
WRITING:
MODELLED
WRITING, GUIDED WRITING, INDEPENDENT WRITING
TEACHERS
ROLE, STUDENTS ROLE

Mooney,
M. 1988, Developing Life-long Readers. Wellington: Learning Media

Demonstration
of
strategies for teaching aspects of narrative:
These
are the strategies demonstrated by Jan Turbill for teachers involved in
the Targeting Text project:
Writing
Descriptive Sentences

Jan
shared the book Fat Frogs on a Skinny Log by Sara Riches( Scholastic,
2000) with a small group of children from a grade 1/2.
After
each page was read the students discussed the illustrations. Jan asked,
"What tells you the frog is enjoying it?" When answering the question
the students were asked to consider the characters' appearances and actions.
They were encouraged to find words to explain their answer rather than
use hand gestures.
A
child was asked to use the whiteboard to draw the frog from the story.
Students were then asked to think of the words they had previously used
to describe the frog. Jan recorded these words around the picture of the
frog on the whiteboard. Words included: skinny, slimy, thin, little, green,
cheeky, happy, slippery, yellow.

The
students were asked to write a description about a frog using as many
of the words from the whiteboard as they could. The purpose of this activity
was to later include such a descriptive passage in a story about a frog.
After
a short writing time the students came together to share their drafts.
Discussion included questions about the descriptive words they used in
their writing, eg. 'How big was your frog? Which word tells us this?',
'He was relaxing. Where was he relaxing?', 'You could join your sentences
together, how could you do this?'.
After
the discussion the students returned to work on their drafts.
Some
examples have been included.

Jodie
was a frog. Jodie was a green frog. He had warts on his back and was a
very small frog. He was always smiley and relaxing on a lily pad. He was
10 cm long.

Green
is cheeky. Green sits and he is lazy. Green is funny. Green is little.
Green is very silly. Green is very, very happy. Green is slimy. Green
is a tree frog.
Developing
plot in a narrative
Jan
worked with a group of mixed ability Grade 4 students to develop plot
in a narrative. The children were encouraged to revisit a well-known story,
eg Jack and the Beanstalk, and to talk about the series of events
that make up the plot.
The
children were then asked to brainstorm the elements of a good story, and
to list some story characters and settings.
For
example:


Next
the children were asked to draw a picture, putting a character into a
setting, and to develop a plot from their drawings to share orally with
a partner.
Finally
the children used their ideas to write a narrative independently.

Improving
sentence structure
Jan
Turbill outlined this guided writing strategy for teaching students to
avoid the overuse of and then in their writing:
- Type up
a text written by one of the students in the focus group.
- Ask students
to put a block or post it note over each 'and then'.
- Ask students
to consider which 'and then' /s could be removed.
- Suggest
alternative words for the remaining 'and then' conjunctions.
- Have students
collect alternatives from literature shared in class. Chart these words
for future use eg. consequently, but, so. This process teaches
students to read like writers.
Teaching
the use of phrases
In
this strategy, students focus on the use of phrases to enrich and extend
their writing:
- Choose
a text with simple sentences containing lots of phrases, such as Jenny
Wagner's John Brown Rose and the Midnight Cat.
- Write
out a sentence such as the following. 'In summer he sat under the pear
tree with her.'
- Discuss
what each phrase tells us; 'in summer' - when; 'he sat under the pear
tree' - where; 'with her' - who.
- Change
each phrase in the sentence eg change 'In summer' (when) to 'Last night'
change 'under the pear tree' (where) to 'beside the fire', change 'with
her' to 'with his dog'.
This
will produce an innovation on the text. It will develop an awareness of
phrasing and the capacity for phrases to be manipulated.

Developing
descriptive language in a narrative
- Students
closed their eyes whilst a descriptive passage from The BFG,
by Roald Dahl, was read.
- Students
were asked to draw their impressions of the character.

- Illustrations
were discussed with a partner.

- The reading
of the passage was continued with discussion of descriptive words throughout.
Some phrases were revisited to clarify meaning eg 'half as long', 'much
thicker'.
- A discussion
of the way we create mental images based on the words read in texts
followed.
- A further
passage was read to the students, describing a view from a window.
- Students
shared the visual images that had formed in their minds.
- Students
were asked, "Which words in the passage helped you form images?" Responses
included 'ghostly', 'mist', 'cooler'. Discussion included the point
that an author's craft is to choose the words to enable readers to create
similar pictures as they read.
- Students
were asked to brainstorm all the words that describe the appearance,
feel and sound of their bedrooms. Words were shared, and through questioning
additional descriptive words were added.
- Students
put the words into prose. 'My bedroom is...'.
- The students
were asked to re-read their own passages, then to read their passages
to the person beside them. The listener was to ask, 'What do you mean
by this?' to assist with the clarification of the description.
- Discussion
included reference to similes, repetition, use of long sentences versus
short sentences and use of verbs as powerful descriptors.


Ways
of structuring writing programs
Teachers
described the way they structure their writing programs to ensure that
they work with students as efficiently and effectively as possible. These
are some of the organisational structures that teachers found worked well:
Model
One

Model
Two

Sharing
teaching strategies developed through the project
During
the evening professional learning session, teachers shared some of the
strategies they had used to assist in the teaching of writing in their
classrooms since the first one-day workshop with Jan Turbill.
Teachers
have:
- created
word/alphabet walls displaying high frequency and thematic words as
a spelling resource for writing;
- established
writing learning centres where a variety of paper, pens, ready made
books, staplers, textas, scissors, magazines etc are provided;
- made
big books based on such things as alliteration with children's names,
innovating on texts, recounting class experiences;
- encouraged
writing in the dramatic play corner through the provision of doctor
appointment books, phone books with note pad and opportunities for children
to make their own signs;
- utilised
computer programs such as Kid Pix and Word Art;
- made displays
of high frequency words by having children place a coloured dot on the
high frequency word each time they read or write that word ('Freckle
words');

- made wall
stories about excursions, retellings of texts read and innovations on
texts read;
- used literature
as a basis for innovation on text;
- created
concept maps in shared writing leading to individual writing;
- developed
story maps after shared reading and used these maps for individual retellings;
- used written
conversation (students wrote questions and answers to each other) to
encourage students to write;
- modelled
editing and proofreading processes;
- valued
social contexts for writing such as teacher writing notes to other teachers;
- taught
structure of a variety of poems, such as cinquain and haiku, through
modelled and shared writing;
- used nursery
rhymes as a stimulus for writing;
- created
a message board for students and/or parents;
- used poetry
to explore similes, metaphors, personification, and collected samples
to display in the classroom; and
- used literature
to compile examples of setting and character descriptions.
Teaching
a range of text types
Later
in the evening workshop, Jan Turbill highlighted the importance of developing
students skills in tackling different types of texts, as well as
narrative texts. Before working with teachers to develop specific teaching
strategies, she outlined some of the distinguishing features of a number
of text types:
Features
of common text types
| |
Social
Purpose |
Framework
|
Language
Features |
| Recount
Such
as:
- Personal
retellings, eg. diary
- Factual
retellings, eg. science experiment or news
- Imaginative
recounts
|
To
tell what happened, to retell events |
- Orientation
(who, where, when)
- Series
of events in time-order
- Personal
comment
|
- use
of nouns to identify people, animals and things
- linking
words to do with time eg later, after,
before
- simple
past tense
- action
verbs
|
| Narrative
Eg
fairytales, legends, plays, science fiction, myths, cartoons, adventure
stories |
To
entertain, create, stimulate emotions, motivate, guide, teach
|
- orientation
(introduce main characters in a setting of time and place)
- complications/problems
(main characters find ways to solve the problem)
- resolution
|
- defined
characters
- descriptive
language
- dialogue
- usually
past tense
|
| Procedure
Eg.
recipes, craft instructions, game rules, science experiments
|
To
tell how to do or make something |
- goal
- materials
- method
or steps
- evaluation
(optional)
|
- use
of action verbs (turn, put)
- linking
words to do with time
- tense
is timeless
- use
of precise vocabulary
|
| Information
Report |
To
organise and present information about a class of things.
|
- general
statement identifying the subject of the information report
- bundles
of information relating to such things as: habits, behaviour,
colour shape
|
- generalised
participants
- impersonal
objective language
- timeless
present tense
- technical
terms
- paragraphs
with topic sentences
|
| Explanation
Eg.
explain how soil erosion occurs, explain why Australian fauna is
unique |
To
explore how things work or how something came to be - to explain
phenomena |
- a
statement about what is to be explained
- explanation
sequence (several statements of reason explaining and elaborating
on the topic)
- concluding
statement (optional)
Explanations
may include visual images such as flow charts or diagrams
|
- cause
and events relationships
- simple
present tense
- generalised
non human participants
- passive
voice eg is driven by
- complex
sentences
- technical
language
|
| Exposition
Eg.
a letter of protest, poster advertising sun-smart behaviour. |
Expositions
are used to argue (or persuade) a case for or against a particular
point of view or position |
- statement
or position
- points
in the argument with evidence and examples (elaboration)
- reiteration
- restate the position in light of the arguments presented
|
- linking
words associated with reasoning eg therefore
- nominalisation
(actions become things). Eg. to pollute becomes pollution
- evaluative
language eg important, significant, valuable
|
Strategies
for teaching aspects of narrative texts
Leads
(the beginning
of the writing)
- Ask the
students to read the first sentence from their library book and listen
to the leads. Most leads introduce character and setting. This is a
good way to move students away from 'Once upon a time' as a lead.
- Make a
chart of interesting leads.
- Ways of
using the chart include:
- Have
students choose a lead and write their own text.
- Students
bring their writing to the guided writing session and read over
their writing, then try to write a new lead.
- Innovate
on a lead from a book eg. keep the structure and change the character
and settings
- Talk
about leads in fiction and non-fiction. How are they different and
why?
Descriptions
- Read a
piece from a book such as The Twits by Roald Dahl. Have students
draw character/s and write a description of them.
Students read their writing to a friend, the friend creates a mental
picture and asks for more details or information if this is necessary.
- Using
a text such as the description of the barn in E.B. White's Charlotte's
Web, students are asked to record the words that described what
a particular setting looked like, smelled like, or sounded like. A list
of words such as 'large', 'old', 'smelled of hay', 'sweet breath' 'peaceful'
is created.
The teacher then introduces the idea of simile and asks students to
rewrite the descriptive phrases as similes eg 'The barn smelt like manure.'
Compare the descriptive language in the actual text (author's version)
to the similes created from the descriptive words, and discuss which
sounds better and why?
- Description
in non-fiction often takes the form of visual images, so students should
be given opportunities to attempt representing their descriptions in
a visual form ie labelled diagrams. For further information on visual
literacy see Steve Moline's book I see what you mean, Longman.
Starting
points
Task:
Provide
students with tickets from a show, transport etc. Tell students:
"You
have found these tickets. Make them a key part of a narrative. Plan an
orientation, complication and resolution."
For
example:
Orientation
Sue, Hazel, Anne (characters)
Walking to school (setting)
Complication
Do we keep the tickets? (2 tickets, and 3 people)
Who do the tickets belong to?
Resolution
Save money if they use the tickets and go together
An
alternative way of using the tickets could be for students to work in
small groups to make up a story about the tickets. Follow this with a
sharing session and discuss character, setting, complication and resolution.
Students then write the story as a group or illustrate the story and use
their illustrations in an oral presentation.
Follow
up to this session could include reading a story about someone who finds
something. Issues could involve discussion on the implications of either
keeping the found object or giving it back.
Use
a narrative such as the Revenge of the Three Blind Mice as a stimulus
for writing. Such texts provide a context for writing for different purposes
and in a variety of text types.
Following
a class reading of the above text any of the following writing tasks could
be explored.
- Write
from different points of view, eg the mouse/human
- Discuss
revenge
- Write
a play, Trial of the Farmer's Wife
- Debate
the issue of capital punishment
- Adapt
other nursery rhymes or fairytales, eg The True Story of the Three
Billy Goats
- Write
a letter to the Three Blind Mice from the farmer's wife
- Write
a newspaper report, or news item about the events in the story
- Write
a blurb for the book
- Write
a biography of one of the characters
Strategies
for teaching information report writing
Below
are three different approaches that can help guide students through the
development of information reports.
Using
factual texts to develop report writing strategy 1
Immerse
students in models of the report genre, Animals in the Wild - Monkey
by Mary Hoffman, was the example used. Following several shared reading
sessions the following strategies could be used to raise student's awareness
of the framework for report writing.
- Reconstruct
a 'cut up' report noting headings, sub-headings and format.
- Label
the various parts of a report and consider the purpose of each part.
When
students are familiar with the structure of a report, jointly construct
a report focussing on the features of the text-type.
Students
then work in guided writing groups to plan their own report using a planning
proforma such as those outlined below.

REPORT
PLAN
| HEADINGS
|
KEY
WORDS |
| Classification
What
is it?
Opening
statement |
|
| Description
What
attributes does it have?
(size,
shape, features) |
|
| Place/Time
Where
is it? Habitat?
When
is it? |
|
| Dynamics/Behaviour
What
does it do? |
|
| Summarising
comment |
|
Students
use their plan to write a report. Guided writing groups can be formed
at any time during this stage to redirect, assist and support the students'
writing.
Individual
conferences and publication are an optional final stage.
An
example of a completed report from a Grade 1/2 student.
Frogs
Frogs
belong to a group of animals called amphibians. Amphibians have
two stages in life; water and land.
Frogs
have four legs and no tail. Some frogs have spots and stripes. Their
colour helps to camouflage them. Frogs have wet skin and bulgy eyes.
Frogs
live in damp places. The tree frog lives in trees. Other frogs live
in ponds or creeks.
Frogs
lay eggs in the water. Frogs come out at night. They make croaking
noises. Frogs jump high. Some frogs climb trees.
Frogs
eat insects and spiders. Some frogs eat other frogs. |
Using
factual texts to develop report writing strategy 2
- Read to
students a variety of texts about a particular topic, eg pigs, and highlight
features of the report genre.
- Discuss
with students what they already know about the topic and what they would
like to find out.
- Use the
technique of webbing/concept mapping/brainstorm to connect the central
topic to related facts. The concept map can be added to each time a
different book is read and additional information is found. Eg:
- Guide
students to think about main headings/sub headings and to group information
accordingly. Eg:
| Appearance |
Behaviour |
| thick
pink or black hairy skin
short
curly tail
trotters |
roll
in mud to keep clean
use
nose to dig |
- Work with
guided writing groups to write paragraphs (bundles of information) using
the headings outlined in the previous session, ie appearance, behaviour.
Using
factual texts to develop report writing strategy 3
- Discuss
with students the features of reports.
- Brainstorm
or use concept mapping to identify headings for a report about a specific
topic.
- Write
the selected headings on large sheets of paper and post them around
the room.
- Ask students
to move around the room in small groups and add information under each
heading on the 'graffiti board'.
- Collate
the information on a grid.
For
example:
| WHALES
|
| |
Appearance
|
Habitat
|
Food
|
Enemies
|
Glossary
|
| Reference:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reference:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Work with
guided writing groups to use the information from the grid to write
a report.
Other
ways of gathering, organising and presenting information in preparation
for report writing include:
- labelled
diagrams;
- flow charts;
- fact files;
- quiz questions;
and
- questions
and answers.
Recount
writing
This
is a teaching strategy that can be used to lead into recount writing.
Card
Trick for free writing
Give
each student three cards.
Card
One
Ask
students to list all the places and people they saw during the holidays
(1 minute brainstorm).
Students
then share the list with a friend.
Have
students place a circle around one thing they would like to share more
about.
Card
Two
Ask
students to draw or write as many words as they can think of that describe
the circled place or person.
Have
students share their words with a partner (1-2 minutes).
Card
Three
Ask
students to use the words from Card Two and write about the place or person
circled on Card One for three minutes non-stop.
Have
students read their writing to a friend.
(This
activity lends itself to a wide range of uses.)
A
Recount Plan:
| Beginning
Who |
Where
|
What
|
When
|
| Series
of events
|
| Personal
comment |
Adapted
from Susan Hill (1999) Guiding Literacy Learners. Eleanor Curtain
Strategies
for teaching exposition writing
When
introducing exposition writing, use real-life experiences and issues in
which children are involved and /or interested.
- Examine
a model of exposition. Various forms of exposition include posters,
advertisements, letters, debates, and literature.
- Through
shared reading develop a framework for the focus type of exposition
- Model
a specific type of exposition writing in shared writing sessions. Through
guided writing sessions students plan and write with teacher's support,
prior to writing independently.
- An exposition
plan might look like this:
| EXPOSITIONS
- PRESENTING BOTH SIDES |
| State
problem or position |
| Points
in the argument with evidence and examples
ARGUMENTS
FOR SUPPORTING
EVIDENCE
1 |
| 2
|
| 3
|
| ARGUMENTS
AGAINST SUPPORTING
EVIDENCE
1 |
| 2
|
| 3
|
| Conclusion
or Summary |
- Students
complete their own exposition writing. This may take a variety of forms
depending on the purpose, such as posters, advertisements, letters,
and debates.
Some
useful strategies for assisting students to see alternative points of
view include the following:
- Using
Edward de Bono's hats, write from different
points of view
- Guiding
students through an academic controversy
- Examining
persuasive tactics, exploring the impact of language and images
- Utilising
the opportunity to develop campaign speeches or 'vote for me' posters
when electing Student Representative Council members or class/sports
captains.
- Using
literature to explore issues from different points of view, such as
The Little Red Hen.
Strategies
for teaching procedural text writing
- Read to
and with students a range of procedural texts, highlighting the purpose
of the text, the sequential nature of the text and the use of verbs
as sentence beginnings.
- The structure
of procedural texts can be explored through:
*reconstruction activities - cutting up instructions and students reordering
them -, highlighting the sequencing events in this text type.
*sequencing activities - giving students a series of pictures outlining
a procedure, students write accompanying instructions
*modelled writing of a procedure after a class experience
- Students
write their own procedures during guided and independent writing. Teachers
provide a stimulus for procedural text writing by using activities such
as the following:
*Students make popcorn, marshmallow rabbits etc. Following the cooking
experience students record the process in the form of a recipe.
*Students conduct science experiments and record the steps in the form
of a scientific procedure.
*Students make something eg. puppets, masks, presents. They can record
what they have done in the form of a set of instructions.
*Students play games and write instructions.
A
plan for procedural writing could look like:
Instructions
| Goals |
| Material/Equipment/Ingredients
|
| Method
|
Adapted
from Susan Hill (1999) Guiding Literacy Learners, Eleanor Curtain
About
Jan Turbill
Jan
Turbill is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Education, University
of Wollongong, Australia. She began teaching in 1964 for the Department
of School Education in New South Wales, teaching Kindergarten - Grade
2 children for 12 years. In 1976 the Department invited her to become
a Language Consultant for its schools across the K-12 spectrum in a metropolitan
region of Sydney. During the following 9 years in this capacity she was
involved in the development and implementation of syllabus documents:
Reading K-12 and Writing K-12. It was also during this period that Jan
Turbill completed her Master in Education in Linguistics at Sydney University
and was made a Fellow of the Australian College of Education for
her contributions to early literacy development.
In 1985 Jan Turbill changed careers and began lecturing in Language Education
at the University of Wollongong. She was awarded her PhD in 1993 at the
University of Wollongong. In 1996 Jan was invited to spend 4 months as
a visiting professor at Hamline University, St Paul, MN, USA, where she
was awarded Graduate Teacher of the Year.
Jan Turbill's research has ranged from early literacy development to the
professional development of teachers. She has written and co-authored
several books in this field. No Better Way to Teach Writing, 1982;
Now We Want to Write 1983; Towards a Reading-Writing Classroom
1984 [with Andrea Butler] and Coping with Chaos, 1987 [with Brian
Cambourne] and Responsive Evaluation, 1994, [with Brian Cambourne].
In
more recent years Jan Turbill's research has been in teacher learning
and professional development. Much of this work has underpinned the successful
staff development program Frameworks co-authored with Andrea Butler, Brian
Cambourne and Gail Langton that has operated in the USA for the past 10
years.
In 1999 Jan and Brian Cambourne were awarded an Australian Research Grant
that funds a Doctoral Scholarship over three years to further study the
relationship between staff development (Frameworks) and change in teachers'
classroom practice and increased student learning.
During 1999 Jan's research moved into the use of technology as a support
for literacy learning in the early years of schooling and as a medium
for professional learning for teachers.
Jan is presently the Director of the Centre for Language Education in
the University of Wollongong (CLEUW). She is the Co-Editor of the Australian
Journal for Language and Literacy (AJLL) and an active member of the Publications
Committee of the International Reading Association as well as serving
on the Advisory Boards for Kids Insights, (an IRA series publication)
and Reading Online (IRA's electronic journal)

|