|
|
|
Especially
for Teachers - Teaching English
Key Learning Processes
-
Three processes are central to learning in English. They are:
reflection, negotiation and collaboration. When students are able
to use the three processes, they not only learn much more effectively,
but they also gain valuable thinking and communication skills
that will stand them in good stead in their lives outside school.
-
The processes work well together. When students negotiate, they
reflect on their learning: when they collaborate, they negotiate
with other students. A learning program that gets students actively
using all three processes is likely to work best.
-
Teachers
who have focused on the three learning processes with their students
say that teaching the necessary skills takes time, deliberate
planning and possibly some rethinking of their own roles. They
also say that once the processes become part of classroom life,
the pay-offs in terms of students' engagement and the quality
of their learning are dramatic.
Reflection
What
is reflection?
Why is it important?
How does reflection fit into the learning program?
Teaching students to reflect
For more information
What
is reflection?
Reflection is thinking about and making sense of experience and
possibilities. It incorporates self-assessment, goal-setting, and
planning. Reflective learners are mindful and purposeful learners.
Teaching students to reflect ensures that they are learning from
their experience, and making connections between their new understandings
and their existing knowledge.
Why
is it important?
It is really only reflection that enables us to benefit from our
learning. When you think about it, it is hard to be sure there is
any worthwhile learning without reflection. No matter how exciting
and inspirational a learning program is, without some opportunities
to reflect, a lot of its potential for learning can be missed. For
teachers with a constructivist view of learning, reflection is vital
because it helps students to build on and develop their existing
understandings.
Reflection
enables students to make explicit all learning outcomes, intended
and unintended. In a rich English program, students have opportunities
for learning that is beyond the scope of the current focus outcomes.
Teachers recognise this when they pick up on incidental teaching
opportunities and notice students' additional achievements. Sometimes
this incidental learning is critically important to students and
reflection helps them to make the most of it.
The
place of reflection in the learning program
Reflection
influences and becomes part of the classroom climate. By teaching
students to reflect and organising time and processes to facilitate
reflection, teachers help students to develop commitment to their
learning. When there is a culture of reflection established in the
classroom, students know that their thoughts and ideas are valued.
As teachers model reflection for students, they show that learners
play a key role in monitoring their own progress and setting new
goals. They can also demonstrate that actions planned as a result
of reflection are more focused and effective, relating directly
to learners' goals.
Reflection
leads to action and understanding. Sometimes students get impatient
with reflection because they don't see the connection between reflection
and purposeful action or better understanding. When teachers work
with students to reflect, they can draw students' attention to the
important difference that reflection has made.
Reflection
is a habit of mind. It can come before, during and after learning
experiences for students.
Reflection
before learning activities helps students to tune into their
existing knowledge and understanding, to plan and to set goals.
By thinking about past experiences and successes, students can
gain confidence in tackling new tasks. By remembering past obstacles,
students can make sure their planning is realistic.
Classroom
example:
Early in the year with her grade 8 class, Jane asks
her students to draw a map showing where they have come
from as readers. She demonstrates on the board with
a map of her own journey from sharing books with parents
to independently reading, discovering favourite authors,
sharing books with friends and starting to read non-fiction.
She includes the new kinds of reading she has been doing
lately, and shows non-fiction as well as fiction, cookery
books as well as novels. Using her map, she discusses
her broad aims for the wide reading program - that students
read regularly for enjoyment, read an increasing range
of material and tackle some more challenging material
to extend their comfort zones. She sets her first personal
goal for reading: to read a new science fiction book,
a genre she does not usually consider. The students
then complete and share their own maps and set realistic
goals in negotiation with Jane.
|
Reflection during activities helps students to monitor
their progress. Sometimes a detailed reflection is useful, sometimes
a brief and simple strategy works well.
Classroom
examples:
Heather's
grade 3 students are working on a sequencing activity
in cooperative groups. She reminds them to reflect on
the social goal for the activity: "Let's check
how you are going with your goal of making sure everyone
contributes to the discussion. Give me a thumbs up if
it's going OK, thumbs down if it's not going so well
at the moment."
Ross's
grade 9 students are part-way through a negotiated unit
on television current affairs. He asks each student
to do a force-field analysis. They draw a vertical line
on a page. On one side they list the factors that are
helping them with their work, on the other they list
the factors that are making it difficult. Then in their
groups they share their results and list ways of boosting
the positive factors and overcoming the negatives.
|
Reflection
after activities helps students to process what they have
learned and set new goals. Sometimes individual reflection is
most useful, but small group and whole class reflection have
a place too.
Classroom
examples:
Karen's grade 5/6 students have just completed a unit
of work on television advertising. Much of the work
was completed in small groups. She asks the groups to
work together to produce a mind-map showing what they
have learned.
Tony's
grade 12 students have just completed some work on analysing
a set text using a negotiated inquiry question. After
working in pairs to negotiate and investigate a question,
they planned, drafted and revised essays that explored
the topic. The completed essays were compiled into a
class booklet which was distributed to all students.
After the students have had the opportunity to read
the essay collection, Tony asks them to complete a journal
entry comparing their current understanding of the text
with the initial impressions recorded in an earlier
entry.
|

Teaching
students to reflect
Since
reflection is a habit of mind that teachers want students to adopt,
one of the best ways to teach it is to model it. Below are some
other techniques teachers use to help students to reflect.
-
Making explicit what the learning is about, by explaining
learning goals, giving overviews or using other organisers.
Y charts or mind-maps can be developed and then used to reflect
on the learning. For example, if a focus is active listening,
students could use Y-charts to set out what active listening looks
like, feels like and sounds like. They can then use their charts
to evaluate their listening skills and set goals for listening.
-
Exploring different ways of thinking about issues. De Bono's
Six Thinking Hats and PMI
strategy are examples of strategies that help students to use
a range of different perspectives and prevent them from getting
locked into one way of reflecting.
-
Helping
students to understand the purpose of reflection by linking it
to planning and goal-setting. For example, when students draw
up a chart showing the skills they used well in an activity, and
the skills they did not use well, the next step might be to choose
specific skills to focus on next time.
-
Involving students in planning and reflecting on the classroom
program. Towards the end of an activity or a unit of work,
cooperative groups can be asked to consider what worked well,
what didn't work well, and what changes they could suggest for
future work.
-
Using
talk to reflect. Students can learn to interview each other
as reflection partners. Teachers can demonstrate how to reflect
by interviewing a student and making notes of the discussion with
them to help them plan and set goals for future work.
-
Varying the form that reflection takes. Extended prose in
a learning log or journal is one possibility, but not the only
one. Some students are able to reflect much more capably if they
can do it through graphic organisers or with the help of some
clear structures. Particularly if students are resistant to the
idea of reflection, it helps to give them an energising, enjoyable
way to reflect. Some possibilities are:
a mind map
a letter to the teacher describing what the student has
learned
a chart listing what is great about a project and what
needs more work
sentence completion... 'the most interesting thing about
studying tv news so far has been...' 'the biggest challenge now
is...' 'I will know our video has worked when...' 'the most important
task ahead is...' 'What I would like to work on in my writing
is...' 'I would like more help with...'
a pictorial representation
a cartoon
response to a simile ....'How is the story you are writing
like a Bass Strait ferry (Sunday, a barbecue) ...?' 'If John Marsden's
Letters from the inside was a sport, what would it be and why?'
'Is the main character in the book you are reading more like Cathy
Freeman or Shane Warne at the moment and why?'
a list of questions about the topic...'Write down five
questions you have now about television news'
-
Using
learning logs or journals. Learning logs are places for students
to record thoughts, questions and comments about their learning
and to make plans for future work. They can also be used to communicate
with the teacher and get feedback. A learning log is a powerful
tool when used well, but it can get tedious for students if the
purpose is not clear and the method used is always the same. To
give it the best chances of success, teachers:
make the purpose clear, stressing its support for learning
and action
model the use of a log by keeping one themselves for a
particular activity
vary the time the log is used (sometimes before a learning
activity - to plan and predict, sometimes after - to evaluate
, sometimes during - to refocus)
vary the kind of input so it is not always continuous prose,
but includes the other forms of reflection listed above.
vary the scope of the entry from reflecting on a term's
work or unit of learning, to reflecting on how the student participated
in a single discussion
respond to students' comments, queries and concerns by
writing back to them in their logs if appropriate, by talking
with individuals, by discussing common responses with the class.
For
more detailed information about using learning logs, see Journals
in Teaching Strategies.
For
more information
Books
Most of these books are available from the Library and Information
Centre.
Bennett,
B., Rolheiser, C., and Stevahn, L. (1991) Cooperative learning:
where heart meets mind Educational Connections, Toronto.
Collis, M and Dalton, J (1989) Becoming Responsible Learners:
Strategies for Positive Classroom Management, Eleanor Curtain
Publishing, Melbourne.
Cooper, C. and Boyd, J. (1996) Mindful learning Global Learning
Communities, Launceston.
Fisher, B. (1995) Thinking and Learning Together: Curriculum
and Community in a Primary Classroom, Heinemann, Portsmouth.
Wilson, J and Wing Jan, L. (1993) Thinking for themselves:
developing strategies for reflective learning Eleanor Curtain,
Armadale.
Negotiation
What
is negotiation?
Why is it important?
How does it fit into the learning program?
A note about negotiation and TCE syllabuses
For more information
What is negotiation?
Negotiation
is involving students in decisions about their learning. When
teachers negotiate with their students, they share their intentions
with them and make it clear what the constraints and non-negotiable
elements of the program are. Then they enable the students to
make their own contributions to planning the learning program.
As in adult negotiations, this does not mean handing over control
to one party or the other, but it does mean working towards outcomes
that are acceptable to all.
A
basic principle of negotiation is that students have access to
all the information needed to make decisions. This means that
teachers are explicit about aims, resources, constraints and non-negotiable
outcomes.
Teachers
negotiate with students as individuals or in groups: students
also negotiate with each other as individuals or within or between
groups. Any aspect of the learning program can be negotiated but
the teacher always retains responsibility for ensuring that the
program is worthwhile and well-designed.
Why
is it important?
There
are many reasons for incorporating negotiation in English programs:
-
Negotiating
with students recognises their vital role in their own learning.
It enables them to take responsibility for learning, and to make
sure that the program connects with their own interests and needs.
-
Negotiation enables students and teachers to create tailor-made
learning programs. A class may be working on the same text or
topic, but individuals or groups of students can negotiate to
explore it in different ways.
-
Negotiation
is empowering. When students have been involved in making decisions
about learning programs and have had a chance to ensure their
needs and interests are catered for, they are much more likely
to be committed and engaged learners.
-
Negotiation
within an English program helps students to develop the communication
skills needed to get things done - such as active listening, questioning,
and discussion skills.
How
does negotiation fit into the English program?
Negotiation is one of the variables that goes into planning every
unit of work, alongside others such as student grouping. Usually
there will be plenty of room for negotiation, occasionally it
may only be appropriate to negotiate in a small way, to determine
the sequence of activities or a deadline. Since negotiation is
a key learning process for all year groups, and is a requirement
in all 11 - 12 TCE English syllabuses, there are few occasions
where much broader negotiation is not possible.
How
much is negotiated depends to a large extent on the experience
of the teacher and the students. When teachers first learn to
negotiate with students, or when they are teaching students with
little experience of negotiation, they usually find it easiest
to start in a small way. These are just some of the things that
can be negotiated in an English program:
-
the particular learning topic chosen
-
the activities that enable students to explore a topic
-
personal or group learning goals
-
the choice of texts
-
questions an inquiry might investigate
-
group roles
-
classroom or group guidelines for discussions
-
the form a presentation could take - visual, written, dramatic...
-
deadlines for assignments
-
the sequence of learning activities
-
the criteria or outcomes that might be assessed
-
the form that reflection might take
-
seating arrangements
-
allocation and organisation of resources
-
time organisation
-
organisation of classroom routines
-
group membership
As
students and teacher become more experienced at negotiation, the
scope becomes broader.
A note about negotiation and 11-12 TCE syllabuses
Most
TCE syllabuses include at least one negotiated study, but it is
definitely not intended that this is the only opportunity for
negotiation in years 11 to 12. It is important for students to
be able to learn and practise the skills of negotiated learning,
such as planning, time-management and consultation with others.
Negotiation is such a powerful learning process that students
benefit greatly from opportunities to negotiate throughout the
program.
No
matter how tight the syllabus is, the first step in negotiation
(sharing the aims, resources, constraints and non-negotiable outcomes)
can always be taken, and students invited to contribute their
suggestions and opinions to help shape the learning program.
Recognising
that students have a far better chance of success in their negotiated
studies if they are experienced negotiators, many teachers introduce
negotiation in a small way as early as possible in the course,
and gradually increase the level of students' input before requiring
them to negotiate individual studies.
The
pressure of the exam for some pre-tertiary courses naturally makes
some teachers (and students!) nervous about negotiation. Being
open and clear about the constraints and negotiating as much as
possible around them is important within this climate. As teachers
become more familiar with syllabuses, the opportunities for negotiation
increase.
For
more information
On
this site
In
their interview for this site, Garry Foster
and Anne Bloomfield talk about the importance of negotiating
with students to cater for their needs and interests.
Steven Figg has given permission for us to include a package
of materials developed by Ogilvie High School on the Grade
10 Negotiated Study.
For school examples of negotiated study Guides, have a look at
those developed by Ogilvie High School
and Devonport High School.
Books
Most
of these books are available from the Library and Information
Centre.
Boomer,
G, Lester, N, Onore, C and Cook, J ed. (1992) Negotiating the
Curriculum: Educating for the 21st Century, The Falmer Press,
London.
Collis, M and Dalton, J (1989) Becoming Responsible Learners:
Strategies for Positive Classroom Management, Eleanor Curtain
Publishing, Melbourne.
Fisher, B (1995) Thinking and Learning Together: Curriculum
and Community in a Primary Classroom, Heinemann, Portsmouth
NH. Pigdon, K. and Woolley, M. (1993) The Big Picture,
Heinemann, Portsmouth.
Wilson, J and Wing Jan, L (1993) Thinking for Themselves: Developing
Strategies for Reflective Learning, Eleanor Curtain, Armadale.
Woodwood, H. (1993) Negotiated Evaluation, Primary Teaching
Association, NSW.

What
is collaboration?
Elements of cooperative learning
Why is collaboration important in English?
Teaching students to collaborate
Cooperative learning activities in the English
program
Defining roles in groups
The importance of group composition
Different types of cooperative learning
groups
More information
What
is collaboration?
Collaboration
involves students working together to further their learning. When
teachers talk about students collaborating, they are most often
talking about students working in small groups, but pairs and bigger
working teams are often useful too. Collaboration implies that the
students are working purposefully and constructively together towards
a common goal.
Elements
of cooperative learning
Co-operative
learning is a particular type of collaboration. There are five elements
that distinguish cooperative learning from other kinds of small
group work (Johnson et al, 1994):
![]()
Positive interdependence |
![]()
The students work on a clear task with a group goal. All students
must make a contribution or the goal cannot be achieved. |
| Individual
and group accountability |
The
group is accountable for achieving its goals and each individual
member is accountable for a particular, identifiable contribution. |
| Face
to face interaction |
Students
interact with each other face to face as part of the task. They
discuss problems, explain their learning to each other, and
tease out ideas. It is not possible simply to divide up the
work and do it without further interaction. |
Specific
focus on interpersonal and
small-group skills |
Skills
such as attentive listening, questioning to clarify ideas, eliciting
responses, or disagreeing in a constructive way are explicitly
taught. Their development is not left to chance. |
| Group
processing or reflection |
Groups
reflect on the cooperative learning skills they have used and
consciously focus on developing their skills in working together. |
Including all these elements creates the best conditions for students
to benefit from small group learning.
Why is collaboration important in English?
Collaborative
learning is an incredibly powerful way of learning. In recent times,
a great deal of research into the value of collaborative and cooperative
learning has been done. Johnson and Johnson (1981) produced overwhelming
evidence that cooperative learning experiences promoted higher academic
achievement than individualistic or competitive learning experiences.
Doise and Mugny (1984) also found that social interaction leads
to more advanced cognitive development. Based on this research,
Hill and Hill (1992) suggest that if schools are to provide for
the optimal intellectual development of their students, they must
actively encourage the development of collaborative skills. This
will result in:
-
the development of thinking skills and deeper levels of understanding
-
a
more enjoyable learning environment
-
the
development of leadership skills
-
the
promotion of positive attitudes to English
-
the
promotion of self-esteem and a sense of belonging; and
-
better
access to a multi-layered curriculum for inclusive learning.
Working collaboratively enables students to develop essential English
communication skills, including the oral language skills involved
in social interaction, such as listening, taking turns, making eye
contact and using quiet voices. As well, talk can be used for developing
problem-solving skills. The abilities to elaborate, paraphrase,
clarify, summarise, mediate and reach decisions, which are important
aspects of successfully using different language modes, are all
learned and reinforced through cooperative learning.
In
the kind of collaborative classroom
described in Key Elements of an English Program, students are encouraged
to consider different perspectives and value differences, while
being confident about expressing their own considered opinions.
This kind of skill is essential in learning to use, analyse and
interpret texts in English.
In Book Talk, Hill and O'Loughlin describe how cooperative
structures can be used to promote talk about texts. This can be
in the form of recounting ideas, creating a story or narrative,
describing procedures, explaining a point of view and creating arguments
to support a position. Using cooperative structures provides opportunities
for students to use the main genres of oral language - recount,
narrative, procedure, explanation, report, argument, and exposition.
Teaching
students to collaborate
As
with other learning skills, collaboration and cooperative learning
skills need to be taught explicitly. Different students need different
levels of explicitness, depending on their ages and previous experiences,
both in and outside of the classroom. For many classes, a great
deal of time may be spent learning how to work in groups, other
classes may move quickly to more complex, problem-solving tasks
in groups.
Depending
on the age and experience of the students, communication skills
can include:
-
active
listening
-
using
eye contact
-
using
quiet voices
-
taking
turns
-
using
people's names
-
making
positive comments about others' work
-
building
on others' contributions
-
encouraging
people to continue
-
using
receptive body language
-
sharing
ideas
-
asking
for help
-
encouraging
others to share ideas
-
clarifying
ideas
-
organising
information
Hill
and Hill (1990) identify the following additional skills for problem
solving and managing differences in The Collaborative Classroom:
![]()
Group problem solving skills |
![]()
Skills for managing difference |
- defining
the problem
- brainstorming
- clarifying
ideas
- confirming
ideas
- elaborating
ideas
- seeing
consequences
- criticising
ideas
- organising
information
- finding
solution
|
- stating
positions
- seeing
the problem from another viewpoint
- negotiating
- mediating
- reaching
consensus
|

Some
ways of teaching cooperative learning skills include:
-
Developing
Y charts with students to help
them flesh out what the skills are like in practice.
-
Asking students who use the skills well to role play their use.
Other students in the class can help to spell out what they saw.
The teacher can participate in the role play too.
-
Using concrete reminders. For example, students can use coloured
pieces of card to help them represent turn - taking. Each student
in a group has a set of cards of a different colour and each time
someone speaks, they put a card into the centre of the table.
At the end of the discussion, the pattern of communication is
plainly there for group members to see and reflect on. (A tangly,
but fun, option is to use a ball of wool. Each speaker winds the
wool once around their hand, then passes the ball to the next
speaker. At the end of the discussion, the web of wool reveals
the communication pattern.)
-
Using a fishbowl strategy, in which observers outside a group
monitor the use of skills within the group and provide feedback.
-
Discussing cooperation as it arises in shared texts, such as David
McKee's Tusk Tusk, Anthony Browne's The Piggybook,
C.S. Lewis's The Narnia Chronicles, John Marsden's Tomorrow,
When the War Began.
-
Including group and individual reflection on cooperative learning
skills as part of work sequences.
-
Ensuring that the students know the value you place on the development
of cooperative learning skills through the kinds of specific feedback
you give.
-
Modelling a collaborative approach in reading and writing conferences.
When these are followed by peer conferences, students can practise
their collaborative skills.
-
Demonstrating cooperative skills through class meetings, which
allow for collaborative discussions and decision-making.
Cooperative
learning activities in the English program
Cooperative
learning structures can enhance many familiar English activities,
providing greater opportunities for all students to become more
actively involved. Some examples are:
Morning
news. In Cooperative Challenges for Infants, Pam Hoyne
describes how she moved from whole class sharing to group sharing.
She organised the students into groups of four. Each person shared
an experience or told an interesting story to the small group,
while the other students listened. Questions could be asked at
the end. When the groups had finished sharing, they all met as
a whole class again. One person from each group would then tell
the class about the items shared. Pam took care to organise the
groups in different ways, sometimes choosing groups herself, sometimes
asking students to choose them with particular guidelines, such
as a mix of boys and girls or older and younger students.
Author
investigation. In Reading and Writing Communities,
the author jigsaw strategy used by Sue Ryan is described. To introduce
students to different authors and to encourage close exploration
of texts, Sue first brainstormed with her class a list of favourite
authors, to which she added a few different names. Through discussion,
the class narrowed down the list to six different authors. Randomly
dividing students into six research groups, Sue gave each the
task of finding out:
-
autobiographical
details;
-
lists of books published;
-
a small selection of the text that demonstrates how the author
writes;
-
how the author 'gets us in' - the author's craft,
for one of six authors (these were Susan Cooper, Anne Martin,
Roald Dahl, Betsy Byars, Robin Klein and Anthony Browne). The
group members divided responsibility for locating the research
information in a one hour reading session. After sharing the sets
of information with another group, each student made an author
poster using information from their group's pooled research. Then,
next session, cooperative groups were formed, each with an expert
on each author. The posters were shared and the research information
described. The students now knew a lot more about some authors
they could choose to read.
The same kind
of process may be used to investigate poets, illustrators, film
directors, cartoonists and other text creators.
Readers
theatre: In her interview for this site, Carol
Arnold describes how she uses cooperative groups of three
for readers theatre presentations of students' personal reading
in her prep class. Every day in Carol's class one student has
a turn to share something they have been reading with the whole
class through a readers theatre presentation. Two helpers assist
in the presentation and also monitor the way the rest of the class
listens.
Presenting
arguments: In The Collaborative Classroom, Susan and
Tim Hill describe an activity called Order in the Court. The students
work in heterogeneous groups of five with the following assigned
roles:
Juror: Listens
to the cases for and against. Votes guilty or not guilty.
Judge: Keeps order, asks for clarification, decides with the jury's
help who is guilty and who is not.
Defendant: Makes a clever argument to defend the accused.
Prosecutor: Makes a case against the accused.
Accused: Accused of the crime. May or may not be guilty. Cannot
speak unless called to speak by the defendant or prosecutor.
The students
practise the court procedure using a goldfish bowl structure,
with the teacher acting as the defendant, some students assigned
the other roles, and the other students watching to see how the
roles work. Once the students are familiar with the procedure,
they can use it in small groups. The accused could be a literary
character, a figure from popular culture, or a more abstract notion.
Discussion:
There are many cooperative learning structures designed to assist
students to use discussion to help them learn. They include: think-pair-share,
1-3-6 consensus , jigsaw
, academic controversy and many others
found in cooperative learning reference texts. Using some of these
structures as an alternative to traditional unstructured group
discussion or whole class discussion makes it much more likely
that students will listen attentively to fellow group members
and contribute their own ideas to discussion. When students have
opportunities to talk through tentative ideas in small groups,
they can contribute to whole class discussion with greater confidence.
Text response
Hill and O'Loughlin, in Book Talk, describe many different
strategies that can be used for collaborative responses to text.
Students can work collaboratively to create mind maps to illustrate
key ideas they identify in texts. Literary
sociograms can be produced collaboratively. QAPX is another
co-operative question and answer strategy suitable for use with
any text and at most band levels. Students work in groups of four.
Person 1 asks a question, (Q), about the text. Person 2 provides
an answer, (A). Person 3 paraphrases, (P), the first response
and person 4 provides extra, (X), information not already given.
Literature circles provide a truly collaborative way for students
to discuss and respond to texts. In his book, Literature Circles:
Voice and Choice in the Student-Centered Classroom, Harvey
Daniels describes how to set up and manage literature circles
effectively so that the students have focused opportunities to
meet, discuss and respond to self-chosen books. Teachers of all
age-groups from kindergarten to senior secondary have used literature
circles in their classrooms with excellent results.
Defining
roles in groups
Defining
the roles of group members serves a number of purposes, including
ensuring that work-load is shared fairly and that students do not
always contribute the same kinds of skills. When roles are clearly
defined, students have a better idea of what is expected of them,
and what 'counts' as participation. Sometimes roles are adopted
for the full-term of an activity, sometimes they can be rotated
throughout the activity. The teacher may give out role-descriptions
randomly (see strategies below for random composition of groups)
or deliberately target particular students for certain roles. Some
examples of roles were given in the morning news activity outlined
above, but most cooperative learning books include a range of suggested
roles. Some roles outlined by Bennett, Rolheiser and Stevahn (1991)
are:
![]()
checker |
![]()
ensures that everybody understands the work in progress |
| scout |
seeks
additional information from other groups |
| timekeeper |
keeps
the group focused on the task and monitors the time |
| active
listener |
repeats
or paraphrases what has been said |
| questioner |
seeks
information and opinions from other members of the group |
| summariser |
pulls
together the conclusions of the group so that they can be presented
coherently |
| encourager |
provides
support to members of the group so that they are more enthused
about their participation |
| materials
manager |
collects
all necessary material for the group |
| reader
|
reads
material to the group |
| pacer |
keeps
the group moving toward the accomplishment of the goal |
| observer |
completes
a check list of social skills for the group |

The importance of group composition
- or groups ain't groups
Collaborative learning has the greatest potential for boosting students'
learning when the groups used are heterogeneous working groups.
Non-heterogeneous and friendship groups may have their place in
classrooms for other purposes, but to really help students to work
together to further their learning, experienced cooperative learning
teachers take pains to ensure that groups are heterogeneous and
that their focus is the task at hand. For a more detailed discussion
of the significance of mixed-ability group membership, refer to
the sources listed at the end of this section.
Teachers
determine group composition in a range of ways. For short -term
tasks, random groupings can be appropriate, so they use strategies
such as:
-
numbered heads (students number off 1 - 5 or however many groups
you need, then all the 1s work together, 2s work together etc.);
-
lining students up in birthday order or alphabetical order and
then dividing the line into the size of groups needed;
-
giving out different coloured cards randomly and then grouping
on a common element (according to colour, shape, etc.);
-
making 4 or 5 piece jigsaws from pictures or cartoons and giving
out the pieces randomly so that groups are formed when students
find others with pieces that fit with theirs.
For
longer-term groups, teachers may form the groups themselves, having
previously tried out different combinations of students in pairs
or other groupings for shorter activities.
In
her interview for this site, Elizabeth
Robinson discusses the different strategies she finds useful
for grouping students in high school.
Different
kinds of cooperative learning groups
Johnson and Johnson (1994) describes three types of cooperative
learning groups that teachers use for different purposes: formal,
informal and base groups. Formal groups are structured with all
the elements of cooperative learning groups and stay together for
the life of a particular activity or project. Informal groups may
be pairs or other groups formed for a brief period of time, perhaps
to share ideas using a cooperative learning structure such as think-pair-share
, 1 3 6 consensus before or after a
whole class activity. Cooperative learning base-groups stay together
for at least the year. They exist to provide students with support,
help and encouragement, and help to develop a sense of belonging
and commitment. Tribes, described below, are a particular
type of base group.
Tribes
- long-term cooperative learning groups
You
might notice that one of the teachers interviewed for this site,
Carol Arnold, talks about using tribes in
her classroom. Jeanne Gibbs' developed the idea of Tribes TLC to
create supportive and productive networks for students and teachers.
It is used in a range of schools and school communities in the USA
where the idea originated. Gibbs advocates the use of cooperative
learning groups that stay together for the long term. The groups
are heterogeneous in as many ways as possible. They are formed by
the teacher, who consciously and deliberately works towards developing
a sense of community in the classroom.
The
students are involved in whole class activities such as the community
circle, in which all students regularly participate. At other times
the students work in pairs or threes to build confidence and social
communication skills. At the start of the year the teacher tries
out various combinations of students so that the tribes that are
eventually established have the best possible chance of working
successfully together.
Teachers choose to use tribes because they feel they create a powerful
sense of community, belonging and commitment. Because there is an
emphasis on valuing difference within the community established
in the classroom, Tribes activities help students to act with autonomy
as well as in concert with a group. Gibbs talks about students developing
the quality of resiliency, the ability to withstand difficulties
they might face.
If
you are interested in finding out more, Jeanne Gibbs' book, Tribes,
provides a good starting point with many great activities for building
a collaborative community. There is also a Tribes
web site.
For
more information
On
this site
In their interviews for this site, a number of teachers discuss
the ways they use cooperative learning strategies and the importance
of collaboration in their programs:
Carol
Arnold (prep)
Doug Bruce (secondary)
Garry Foster and Anne Bloomfield (secondary)
Angela Bird (senior secondary)
Useful web sites
Books
Most of these books are available from the Library and Information
Centre.
Bennett,
B., Rolheiser, C. and Stevahn, L. (1991) Cooperative Learning:
Where Heart Meets Mind, Educational Connections, Ontario.
Cairney, T.H.and Munsie, L. (1992) Beyond Tokenism: Parents as
Partners in Literacy, Australian Reading Association, Victoria
Collis, M and Dalton, J (1991) Becoming Responsible Learners:
Strategies for Positive Classroom Management, Eleanor Curtain,
South Yarra.
Daniels, H. (1994) Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in the
Student-Centered Classroom, Stenhouse Publishers, Maine.
Davies, A., Cameron, C, Politano, C and Gregory, K., (1994) Together
is Better: Collaborative Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting,
Eleanor Curtain, Armadale.
Gibbs, J (1995) Tribes: A New Way of Learning and Being Together,
Center Source Systems, Sausalito, California.
Hill, S and Hancock, J., (1994) Reading and Writing Communities:
Co-operative Literacy Learning in the Classroom, Eleanor Curtain,
Armadale.
Hill, S and Hill, T, (1990) The Collaborative Classroom: A Guide
to Co-operative Learning, Eleanor Curtain, Armadale.
Hill, S. and O'Loughlin, J. (1995) Book Talk: Collaborative Responses
to Literature, Eleanor Curtain Publishing, Armadale.
Walker, D and Brown, P, (1994) Pathways to Cooperation, Eleanor
Curtain, Armadale. Wilson, J. and Hoyne, P. (1993) Co-operative
Challenges for Infants, Thomas Nelson Australia.

|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|