These
activities were designed by Jacqui Frew for Writers Workshop
students.
Feeling
that many students titles just didnt do justice
to their work, I decided to focus on title-writing for a lesson
or two to help them create stronger titles for their writing.
First
I put on the whiteboard this list of texts published with alternative
titles and asked if the students knew of any more (they did
know of some alternative film titles, but I didnt think
to record them at the time):
| Writer
|
Published,
produced as |
And
also as |
| Ernest
Hemingway |
The
Sun Also Rises |
Fiesta
(in
the USA) |
| John
Marsden |
Tomorrow,
When the War Began |
When
the War Began
(title rumoured to be used for USA release)
|
| Thomas
Keneally |
Schindlers
Ark |
Schindlers
List
(the
Steven Spielberg film) |
| John
Bryson |
Evil
Angels |
A
Cry in the Dark
(the
Fred Schepisi film, for USA release) |
The
students considered which title they preferred if they knew
the text, or which one they would rather read or view if they
didnt know it. After wed shared their choices, we
considered what their preferred titles did for the text. The
discussion about Evil Angels vs A Cry in the Dark
was particularly interesting, with the class pretty much
evenly divided.
Next
we did a quick raid on the library with each student taking
a fiction shelf to scan, coming back with three interesting
titles to share. We listed them on a poster to put up as inspiration
for other writers, and discussed which ones we would most like
to read.
Then
I did the title-less poems activity from Introducing
Poems, in which students were given three poems without
their titles, and in groups, worked out titles for each. We
put the suggestions on the whiteboard and discussed which we
thought worked best and why, before comparing them with the
original titles. This helped the students to realise that titles
can perform many different functions in poetry.
(Earlier
in the course, we had done the reverse of this and students
had taken turns to chose titles from poetry anthologies for
the class to use as a quick-writing activity. As we reflecting
on the different kinds of writing the same title had produced,
the students became more aware of the power of the dynamic between
title and writing.)
Next,
I invited students to choose a piece of their own writing that
they would like to have another go at titling. We shared and
discussed their revised titles.
It
was surprising what an impact this simple set of activities
had on the class. We realised that some titles work best in
anticipation of the work and others in retrospect. We discovered
a couple of students with particular talents as title-writers
who became an excellent resource. The students started making
much stronger, more considered, selections for their titles.
Many found that as they concentrated on working out the right
title for their writing, they were coming to grips with what
really lay at its heart. Then they were able to revise with
this focus in mind. The difference this sometimes made to their
work was remarkable.