Speaking
and listening
Bands B,C,D
What is it?
Debating
is a structured way of exploring the range of views over
an issue
What
is its purpose?
-
To promote collaboration
-
To develop research skills
-
To assist in the development of argument.
-
To develop understanding of a basic principle of democracy
- that opposing arguments should be presented in order
to develop understanding of an issue
-
To develop contextual understanding by exploring a variety
of views
How
do I do it?
There are many ways of doing this. This is one way that
works.
-
Brain storm topics and get the students to present them
as statements with a strong and clear point of view. For
example:
If introduced, capital punishment would solve the crime
problem
Jobs are more important than the environment
-
Divide the class into teams of 6, 3 for the motion, 3
against. Spare students can take on the roles of time
keeper, adjudicator, chairperson.
-
Allow sufficient preparation time
-
Set the room up appropriately. Below is one way this can
be done:
| ![]()
AFFIRMATIVE
|
![]()
NEGATIVE
|
| |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
| |
2
|
|
|
2 |
|
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| |
|
Audience |
|
|
-
The debate is introduced in a formal way by the chairperson.
Affirmative 1 speaks first, Negative 1 second, affirmative
2 third until the final speaker negative 3.
-
To start it is best if the students debate their own point
of view
-
As the group gets more experienced it is worth negotiating
many of the 'rules'.
-
Each speaker talks for an agreed time - this would vary
according to experience and age.
For each team:
![]()
Speaker 1 |
Introduce
topic, team's argument and team. Speaker 1 in negative
can rebut also. |
| Speaker
2 |
Rebuttal
and continue team's case |
| Speaker
3 |
Rebuttal
and summary of team's case |
-
Judging - equally divided between:
![]()
Matter |
![]()
The content |
/10
|
| Manner |
How
they said it |
/10
|
| Method |
How
well they worked as a team |
/10 |
How
can I adapt it?
-
Peer adjudication
-
Inter -class competition
-
Use brief, three minute debates to practise the skills
with less experienced or reluctant students. Students
work in groups of four for each topic. Each side has one
presenter and one coach to assist in preparation. Preparation
time is brief, a maximum of five minutes to start with.
One side presents an argument followed by the other side
and then the class votes on the winning argument through
a show of hands. (This strategy is based on one outlined
by John Marsden at the 1998 TATE/ALEA conference)
How
can it be used to evaluate students' learning?
The following can be assessed through debating:
-
Social skills in working with others
-
Contextual understanding
-
Speaking and listening
-
Research skills
Where
can I find out more?
For
further information about debating contact the Tasmanian
Debating Union. For help in developing arguments about
a wide range of topics, have a look at the site Debatabase.
Tirade
online is the Debaters Association of Victoria's site.
Back issues of newsletters provide useful information about
debating skills and adjudication.