|
|
|
Resources
- Discussion Papers
Critical Literacy and Visual Texts:
Windows on Culture
J.
Browett
Lecturer,
School of Education, University of Tasmania at Launceston
ABSTRACT
By
developing insights about the construction of culture and about their
own cultural frameworks, students are able to reach deeper understandings
about their own personal identity and value, and about the multiple ways
of being in the world. A sense of self and the ability to successfully
«engage with othernessˇ are vital capacities for students. Visual texts
are a readily accessible source of information about culture as they encode
the essential relationship between culture and language. By using a Critical
Literacy approach to visual texts students are able to «readˇ a wide spread
of cultural information, ranging from the symbolic to the ideological,
and the sorts of power relationships that exist within cultures. Through
this approach individuals can develop an awareness of their active role
in making meaning from text. They are able to reflect on and make explicit
their own cultural contexts, and those of others.
Workshop
materials and experiences will provide hands-on strategies for use in
classrooms. These will be based on visual texts from a variety of Asian
cultures. Participants will be presented with frameworks from which to
generate other strategies and processes.
INTRODUCTION
This
paper will emphasise the relationship between texts and culture, with
special emphasis on the visual. A critical literacy framework shows how
authentic visual texts can be read to reveal a wide spread of cultural
information, ranging from the symbolic to the ideological, and the sorts
of power relationships that exist within cultures. Through this approach
students can develop an awareness of their active role in making meaning
from text. Students are able to reflect on and make explicit their own
cultural framings. In understanding that viewpoints are culturally determined,
students are able to 'engage with otherness' (Scarino, 2000, p. 9).
DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR CULTURE
Teaching
and learning about other cultures and societies historically has been
an important element of the Australian school curriculum. Studies of Asia: A Statement for Australian Schools (2000), for instance,
lists a range of principles to guide curriculum design and the implementation
of teaching and learning about culture including: learning should challenge
stereotypes about peoples and cultures; studies of culture should help
students critically analyse representations of peoples and nations in
the media, literature and other sources; cultural and national similarities
and differences should be approached with knowledge respect and empathy
( p.8).
To
move beyond a cursory understanding of culture students need to develop
a sense of their own cultural identity, develop deeper concepts about
the construction of culture, and understand that there are many ways of
being in the world. To develop an approach to teaching and learning that
encompasses current notions about culture Scarino points to four ways
of thinking about culture (2000, p. 8). Firstly, the recognition that
culture is multi-faceted. It encompasses such items as social institutions
and practices, values, protocols, signs and symbols, icons, rituals, power
relationships, and the production of text (Scarino, 2000, p. 8; Carr,
1999, p. 105; Lankshear, 1997, pp. 14-15). The second idea recognises
that these items are not static in time or place. There does not exist
a 'normative' culture. Variables such as gender, ethnicity, socio-economic
group, religion, age all work together to form an infinite number of ways
of being in the world.
A
third notion is that language, texts and culture are embedded in one another.
Kress claims an acute relationship between language, texts and culture
when he states that 'every act of communication is a cultural event. The
structures, processes and contents of communication are given by culture¸
Culture sets the grounds entirely for communication¸' (1988, p. 10).
The forth idea stresses that the construction of culture itself is a matter
for observation, and that individuals' own interaction with culture should
be a matter for reflection. In order to understand another culture there
needs to be a realisation that the individual's own viewpoint is culturally
determined - attitudes, values, beliefs and emotions. Critical literacy
offers a tool for moving students towards these understandings.
CRITICAL
LITERACY
Critical
literacy rests on the idea that language and literacy do not occur in
a vacuum. Rather they are practices that occur in, and are shaped by,
their social and cultural settings (McKay, 1999, p. 20; Luke & Freebody
cited Anstey & Bull, 1996, p. 193; Gee cited Carr, 1999, p. 105).
Hilary Janks (cited Morgan, Lankshear, Williams, Gilbert & Werba,
1996, p. 3) provides some points that help to clarify a critical literacy
approach:
„
Critical Literacy emphasises that texts are constructed
and so can be unpacked.
„
By deconstructing text, readers / viewers become aware of
the text creator's choices.
„
Every choice emphasises what was included in the text and
places what was excluded in the background or omits it altogether.
„
Knowing this enables readers / viewers to examine these
choices.
„
Many of the selections are the result of socio-cultural
choices. Every socio-cultural group has shared conventions and norms to
do with language whether it be written, visual or spoken.
Critical
literacy requires a '¸'reading of cultures', around, behind, underneath,
alongside, after and within the text' (Luke, Comber and O'Brien, 1996,
p. 35). In the classroom a critical approach to text can shed light onto
socio-cultural choices, norms and conventions; onto shared cultural understandings
and experiences; onto the dominant groups and power relations that exist
within the target cultures. It can assist students to engage with text
and to see different cultural perspectives.
The
critical literacy approach to text offers an opportunity to 'shake up
cultural certainties' (McKay, 1999, p22) through the interrogation of
text. It provides the tools for noticing, analysing and reflecting on
text. Culture can be seen as playing a central role in the choices made
in the production of text, and in the interpretation of text.
Carr suggests that even at the earliest stages of learning students
can examine texts to find key concepts, symbols and systems of representation.
Students begin to realise that theirs is only one of a multitude of ways
of viewing the world (2000, p. 109).
Cultures
contain a large body of texts that are representative of culture - visual
texts (films, CD Roms, television,
Internet sites, signs, cards, advertisements, picture books, works of
art and so on). Such texts embody elements from the past, from contemporary
culture and from emerging culture that can be examined in a critical manner.
VIEWING
Visual
Literacy gives students the tools with which to more fully appreciate
visual texts as intentionally crafted and functional texts, and as transmitters
of values and ideologies: as sites of culture (Anstey and Bull, 2000,
p. 186). There is a wealth
of information about the target culture that can be gained by examining
a spread of visual texts and their construction - symbols, icons, settings,
characters, emphases, omissions and so on. Through these texts it is possible
for students to access worldviews, values and ideologies other than their
own (Callow, 1999, p. 2). Another key idea, embedded in a critical literacy
approach, is that in order to generate 'preferred readings' creators of
visual text rely on assumptions about the joint knowledge, experience
and values of the target audience. They may reflect the dominant socio-cultural
group in which the text is produced and may try to circumvent other readings
(McLean, 1995, p. 3; Quin, McMahon and Quin, 1996, p. 11). By asking questions
of visual texts students can learn about the power relations that exist
within a culture, and can gain an understanding of the multi-faceted,
complex nature of that culture.
Elements
of socio-cultural experience from other target cultures can be examined.
For example students may miss the point of a visual joke, or be confronted
by an image. By examining
the tensions that may exist between their own interpretation of visual
texts and the preferred reading, students can arrive at new understandings
about their own cultural locatedness.
Text
Selection
A
diverse range of authentic visual texts can be drawn from other cultures.
Multiple texts should be presented to give a full description of the multi-faceted
nature of the target culture. Anstey and Bull (2000) provide some key
questions about representation of culture in picture books that are also
valuable in considering the range of visual texts:
„
Are minority groups represented, or just the dominant cultural
group?
„
Are characters shown to be individuals, with diverse physical
characteristics / clothing / occupations?
„
What / whose experiences, histories and heritages are included
or omitted?
„
Are settings diverse? eg architecture; fauna and flora;
rural / urban.
„
Is the text creator's purpose overt propaganda, or the stereotypical
representation of a minority group? (pp. 217-222)
Connections
with English - a curriculum profile
for Australian Schools
The
following table shows how notions of culture connect with the reading
and viewing strand of English - a curriculum profile for Australian Schools. These key concepts
appear under the stand organisers Contextual
Understanding, Linguistic Structures
and Features and Strategies.
Table
1: Key Notions
|
Contextual Understanding |
Linguistic Structures
& Features |
Strategies |
| „
Language and culture are intertwined.
„
Creators of visual texts rely on common cultural understandings.
„
Groups within cultures have alternative experiences,
values, attitudes and beliefs. They may construct and interpret
texts differently.
„
There is no one normative culture. A version of cultural
life depicted may not represent reality for all.
„
Interest groups exist in all cultures and may affect
texts.
„
'Preferred' meanings rely on appropriate cultural
knowledge. 'Alternative' readings occur as a result of differences
in the cultural experience of the creator and the reader. Differences
in readings due to cultural factors are a rich ground for exploration. |
„
Visual texts have structures, features and conventions.
„
Visual texts use techniques eg the use of symbols,
setting, and characterisation.
„
Visual images can work together with written text
to create meaning.
„
Distinct genres can be determined in visual texts.
„
Visual texts are intentionally constructed and involve
choices.
„
Choices about elements of visual texts will be culturally
determined.
|
„
Students need a language to talk about structures
and features of texts / elements of culture
„
Students' understanding of the impact of socio-cultural
contexts / orientation enhance their understandings about text;
the relationship between language
and culture; elements of culture
„
Students can develop an awareness of their active
role in making meaning from text.
„
Students can reflect on and make explicit their strategies
for interpreting text.
„
Students can reflect on and make explicit their own
cultural framings. Valuing these is empowering.
„
In understanding that viewpoints are culturally determined
students are able to 'engage with otherness'. |
(Curriculum
Corporation, 1994a, pp. 8-9; McLean, 1995, pp.
7-8; Lo Bianco, Liddicoat & Crozet, 1999, pp. 184-185; Scarino,
2000, p. 9)
In
order to connect the key notions to classroom practice some key questions
are included in the following table. This is a starting point from which
to generate other questions, processes and strategies.
Table
2: Sample Questions
| Situational
Context
Where
does this text appear? Who has created it? Are commercial, ideological or other
interests apparent? Who
is the intended audience? What shared experiences / knowledge is
assumed about the viewers? |
|
Socio-cultural
Context / Strategies
What
is the text about? What is shown in the text? What is happening?
How
is / are (children; adults; gender; heroes; villains; other characters
or characteristics) shown / constructed? Why are they portrayed
in that way? Who benefits from ______ being shown in this manner?
Does
the text have any inherent values / attitudes? Whose view of the
world is this?
What
(actions; behaviours; emotions; values; relationships) are shown?
Which are approved / disapproved?
What
elements of humour are included?
What
(items; props; symbols; icons; signs) are included? Why are they
included? What are their meanings / uses?
What
kinds of social situations / realities are shown?
What
clues are given to cultural heritage, contemporary or emerging construction
of culture?
Whose
histories / experiences are included or omitted?
What alternatives could be presented?
What
does the text reveal about dominant groups / power relationships
within the culture?
If
you changed (item, colour, character / characteristic, behaviour,
symbol etc ), how would it change the meaning of the text?
How
does the text invite the viewer to think about _________? What other
interpretations are possible? For whom are those interpretations
possible?
What
sort of cultural knowledge is needed to understand this text? How
did you interpret _______? How did others in the class interpret
_______? Why have similar or different interpretations occurred?
What
is inside / outside your own experience? |
|
Structures
and Features
How
do the use of elements and of balance and layout combine to create
(characters; settings; atmosphere; actions; story; values; humour;
etc)?
Examples
of elements: colour and its value; texture; line; shape; form; framing;
lighting; movement;
sound / items, symbols, signs etc / clothing, body language,
gestures; facial expressions; touch & distance
Examples
of balance and layout - placement in foreground, background, size,
proximity, point of view, focal points, and other editing decisions.
How
does the choice of media / techniques affect the meaning? How are
these affected by situational or cultural factors? |
(Anstey
and Bull, 2000, pp. 191-193, 180-186; Quin, McMahon & Quin, 1997,
pp. 9-29,71; Howard, 1995,
pp. 8-9; Pitt, 1995, p. 46)
The
framework and key questions recognise that 'the relationship between language
and culture is ¸ synthetic and organic' (Lo Bianco, Liddicoat & Crozet,
1999, p. 184). They provide key notions that can assist teachers in making
these ideas explicit to students through the medium of visual texts, and
a concrete starting point in translating these into classroom practice.

CONCLUSION
Adopting
a critical approach to authentic visual texts from target cultures is
one practical way for students to develop insights about the construction
of culture and about their own cultural framework. Students can indeed
reach a '¸deeper appreciation of their own personal identity and value'
(Vale, Scarino & McKay, 1995, p. 36). By interrogating visual text
they are able to develop understandings about, and to make informed comparisons
with, other cultures - including their own. The essential relationship
between communication and culture in everyday life, as encoded in authentic
visual texts, can be examined to reveal the diversity of cultural experience
- the multiple ways of being in the world.
References
Anstey,
M. & Bull, G. 1996, The
Literacy Labyrinth, Prentice Hall, Sydney
Anstey,
M. & Bull, G. 2000, Reading
the Visual, Harcourt, NSW
Asia
Education Foundation
2000, Studies
of Asia: A statement for Australian Schools, Curriculum Corporation,
Victoria.
Callow,
J. 1999, Image
Matters, PETA, NSW
Carr,
J. 1999, 'From 'Sympathetic' to 'Dialogic' Imagination: Cultural Study
in the Foreign Language Classroom', in Striving
for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education,
eds J., Lo Bianco, A. Liddicoat, & C. Crozet, Language Australia,
Melbourne
Curriculum
Corporation, 1994a, English
- a curriculum profile for Australian schools, Curriculum Corporation,
Victoria
Howard,
J. 1995, 'Reading and Viewing Advertisements', in Texts:
the heart of the English Curriculum series 1, eds P. Adams & H.
Campagnia-Wildash, DECS, South Australia
Kress,
G.(ed) 1988, Comunication
and Culture, New South Wales University Press, NSW
Lankshear,
C. Gee, J. P., Knobel , M. & Searle, C. 1997, Changing
Literacies, Open University Press, UK
Luke,
A., Comber, B. & O Brien, J. 1996, 'Critical Literacies and Cultural
Studies', in
The
Literacy Lexicon, eds G. Bull, & A. Anstey, Prentice Hall, Sydney
Lo
Bianco, J., Liddicoat, A. & Crozet, C. (eds) 1999, Striving
for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through
Language Education, Language Australia, Melbourne
McKay,
P. 1998, «Literacy Development in Languages Teaching: A Review for Language
Teachersˇ, prepared for the AFMLTA
McLean,
K. 1995, 'Visual texts: which ones, why and how?, in Texts:
the heart of the English Curriculum series 1, eds P. Adams & H.
Campagnia-Wildash, DECS, South Australia
Morgan,
W. Lankshear, C. Williams, L. Gilbert, P. & Werba, S. 1996, 'Workshop
Materials', in Critical
literacy: readings and resources, AATE, South Australia
Pitt,
J. 1995, Not
Just After Lunch On Wednesdays, DECS, South Australia
Quin,
R., McMahon, B., & Quin, R. 1996, Teaching
Viewing and Visual Text: Primary,
Curriculum Corporation, Victoria
Scarino,
A. 2000, 'The Neglected Goals of Language Learning', Babel,
Vol. 3, No. 34, Summer, pp 4-11
Vale,
D., Scarino, A. & McKay, P. 1995, Pocket
ALL, Curriculum Corporation, Victoria
|